EN
Translate:
EN
Translate:
For copyright infringement cases, a Judge must permit film experts to testify and give expert opinions. Yet, the Judge in the 12 O’Clock Boyz copyright infringement case refused to allow any film experts. No film expert from the Defendants or 12 O'Clock Boyz took part in the case.
In addition, Judge Brodie never watched the original 12 O’Clock Boyz 2001 and 2003 films during the case, which is another legal violation. Judge Brodie was dead set on blocking a "Jury" from watching the original 12 O’Clock Boyz 2001 and 2003 films. Judge Brodie was also dead set on not having a jury decide the case, as a jury would find Lotfy Nathan and his co-defendants guilty of infringement. Hence, there was no trial.
Due to the civil lawsuit filed against Judge Brodie in November 2022, Judge Brodie was automatically disqualified from the 12 O’Clock Boyz copyright case, and any orders by her are not legally valid. For more information, view the below News Releases.
Press Release: New York Judge Finds Herself a Defendant in Court After Refusing to Step Down From Copyright Case
12 O'Clock Boyz files response to the New York District Court
$10 Million Lawsuit Complaint Filed Against New York Federal Judge Sitting in Copyright Case.
Press Release: 12 O’Clock Boyz Filmmakers File to Recuse Federal Judge in Copyright Case.
12 O'Clock Boyz file a motion to recuse the federal Judge from the case.
12 O'Clock Boyz file a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against federal Judge.
A request to the Register of Copyrights has been used in many federal cases to resolve copyright disputes. Most notably, it was first
used in the landmark case, Velazquez-Gonzalez v. Pina.
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Send emails to: Media@12OClockBoyzNews.com 12 O'ClOCK BOYZ is the registered trademark owner of 12 O'Clock Boys. The leading source on Baltimore's 12 O'Clock Boyz, urban dirt-bike riding and entertainment.
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.